Monday, March 10, 2008
A Note About Samuel and God's Involvement with Man
March 17, 2003
What strikes me most about reading 1 Samuel this year (end--I have read it twice this year) is the nearness of God--His activity, His direct intervention and interaction with men, particularly, Samuel and David. Here the sense of Calling and Purpose are loudly present. This is no theistic-wind-up-the-world-and-see-what-it-does God. This God speaks to Eli. He speaks through Eli to Hannah. He speaks to the child Samuel, and ever afterward to Samuel.
This God comforts Samuel when his people ask for a king, rejecting Samuel's leadership as their prophet-judge as insufficient. This God causes men to prophecy quite apart from their intentions (remember Saul?). This God comforts Samuel again when he is grieving for Saul after God reveals that He is going to replace him. David finds comfort in God repeatedly in this book. He is not a God far away who leaves His people to muddle through their fallen world on their own. He asks them to depend on Him and when they do He defends and protects and comforts. . .
He has purposes and a will, and yet he allows for human agency. IF Saul had obeyed, God says he would have had an heir on the throne forever. . . it all comes down to the choice of co-laboring with God or choosing to go off on one's own. If Saul had obeyed, does that mean David would never have come to fulfill the role he did? Was David predestined to be the ancestor of Christ? Was Saul predestined to fail? I doubt the latter, --God could certainly have worked both families in to the colorful family tree He designed for Jesus) (:
What strikes me most about reading 1 Samuel this year (end--I have read it twice this year) is the nearness of God--His activity, His direct intervention and interaction with men, particularly, Samuel and David. Here the sense of Calling and Purpose are loudly present. This is no theistic-wind-up-the-world-and-see-what-it-does God. This God speaks to Eli. He speaks through Eli to Hannah. He speaks to the child Samuel, and ever afterward to Samuel.
This God comforts Samuel when his people ask for a king, rejecting Samuel's leadership as their prophet-judge as insufficient. This God causes men to prophecy quite apart from their intentions (remember Saul?). This God comforts Samuel again when he is grieving for Saul after God reveals that He is going to replace him. David finds comfort in God repeatedly in this book. He is not a God far away who leaves His people to muddle through their fallen world on their own. He asks them to depend on Him and when they do He defends and protects and comforts. . .
He has purposes and a will, and yet he allows for human agency. IF Saul had obeyed, God says he would have had an heir on the throne forever. . . it all comes down to the choice of co-laboring with God or choosing to go off on one's own. If Saul had obeyed, does that mean David would never have come to fulfill the role he did? Was David predestined to be the ancestor of Christ? Was Saul predestined to fail? I doubt the latter, --God could certainly have worked both families in to the colorful family tree He designed for Jesus) (:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment